In the pre-COVID era, the collaboration software market was only growing at a decent pace. In 2020, it grew exponentially when the world was put under lockdown. While stuck in the quarantine, we all diligently used collaboration platforms, more than ever before. It took a pandemic to realize the vital importance of collaboration technology. It has allowed everyone to stay connected in testing times. Be it professional communication or personal ones, it has helped conversations get going. A crop of collaboration platforms became popular overnight including Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Cisco Webex, and more.

Broaden support to the Webex DX80 and Room Series devices during Webex Teams meetings. None: Flexible cloud evolution: Leverage existing on-premises investments such as Microsoft Exchange, Active Directory, and Cisco Unified CM. Use Jabber with team messaging mode to seamlessly deliver new team collaboration features to existing UC users. Webex Teams is the leading team collaboration app. Get access to screensharing, group messaging, cross-collaboration tools, and app integrations. Webex (formerly Webex Teams) pricing at a glance. Webex Teams is an all-in-one solution for messaging, file sharing, white boarding, video meetings, calling, and more. It keeps teams connected anytime, anywhere, and moves work forward faster. Webex Teams is included in all Cisco Collaboration Flex Plan Meetings and Calling subscriptions.

All these products were lying under the radar under the gamut of products from their parent companies. Today, these collaboration software drive maximum attention and are flagship products for them.

Interestingly, the two big brands Cisco and Microsoft coming with reputed products: Teams and Webex. How will you determine the best collaboration platform for your organization?

We have already compared Microsoft Teams vs Zoom in our previous posts. In this article, we look to provide a feature comparison of Microsoft Teams and Cisco Webex.

Let us compare the basic features of Teams vs Webex:

Basic Features	Microsoft Teams	Cisco Webex
One-to-one chats	Yes	Yes
Group chats	Yes	Yes
Guest Access	Yes	Yes
Online Meetings	Yes	Yes
Video calling	Yes	Yes
Screen sharing	Yes	Yes
File sharing	Yes	Yes
Scheduling meetings	Yes	Yes

Looking at the table above, it seems that both Teams and Webex have all basic features. In other words, no important feature for a smooth collaboration is missing in either of the platforms. Now, we must compare enhanced features by digging deeper into the products to find differentiation.

Teams vs Webex: Telephony feature comparison

One of the standout features in the comparison between Teams vs WebEx is the way telephony solutions are offered on either platform. Microsoft offers Teams with Phone System, a Private Branch Exchange (PBX) solution for businesses with Microsoft 365 for an integrated cloud solution.

Cisco takes a different approach to fit every type of customer requirement: on-premises or one-tenant platforms hosted by a partner, and Webex calling for small and midsize organizations. Cisco’s partners including West, IntelePeer, and ThinkTel offer the PSTN access for Webex.

Teams vs Webex Pricing Comparison

Determining pricing as per the licensing requirements can be a bit perplexing for Teams vs Webex comparison. When we look at the bare minimum pricing to get started with the platform, Microsoft Teams has a clear advantage. Microsoft Teams is also available for free with limited features, allowing anyone to get a taste of it without paying anything. If one gets the bare minimum Microsoft Office 365 subscription (Microsoft 365 Business Basic at $5/user), the features unavailable in the free version can be unlocked. Higher the Office 365 plan, the better the features with Microsoft Teams. Though Cisco Webex also offers a free version, in comparison, Microsoft Teams offers far more generous features in the free version. Cisco Webex’s cheapest plan starts with $13.50 per user per month and calling service add-ons would be priced extra. When you must decide between Teams vs Webex with cost as a factor, Microsoft Teams wins hands down.

Teams vs Webex Security Comparison

When it came to comparing Zoom with Teams, security was a pertinent problem in Zoom. This is the reason many large organizations shied away from using Zoom. But what is the case when comparing Teams vs Webex for security?

Both Teams and Webex are products of the behemoth companies, Microsoft and Cisco, which has zero tolerance for compromise in security. Both Microsoft and Cisco have taken respective steps to strengthen security for Teams and Webex, respectively.

Microsoft Teams comes with Office 365 platform. It enjoys high-level encryption and enterprise-grade security built for the rest of Office 365. Office 365 Enterprise comes with premium security features (eDiscovery, Archiving, Legal Hold, Retention) which will be required for compliance such as HIPAA, GDPR, and more. Overall, Microsoft invests $1 billion every year in its bid for robust security.

Similarly, Cisco Webex Teams has a huge number of certifications that attest to their security promise. Like Microsoft Teams, it has compliance features such as eDiscovery, unique device PINs, idle time, content retention flexibility, and more. Marginally more control for the end-users is available in Webex, while it may be troublesome for uninitiated or IT admins if they have a strict organizational policy as compared to the end-users.

Teams vs Webex Integration with Other Software

Microsoft Teams is tightly integrated with all other Microsoft products due to the Office 365 ecosystem. If you use Microsoft Office along with Teams, it would be smooth user experience. Though Cisco has a long list of applications that can be installed and integrated from the App Hub store, Microsoft Teams is built for better integration with third-party applications.

Microsoft Teams vs Webex: Suggestions or Recommendations?

If you are looking for a simple answer, there is obviously difficult to pick a firm winner because there are a number of factors in selecting the right collaboration platform. Just comparing the fundamental characteristics of Webex vs Teams would not provide a definitive answer. But if we dig deeper to compare the peripheral features such as telephony extensions, security, room format, integration with other software, and pricing would help you decide between Microsoft Teams vs Cisco Webex.

Both Teams and Webex are excellent products coming from technology giants Microsoft and Cisco, respectively. Therefore, it is a tough choice to make. Like all other platforms including Webex, Microsoft Teams caters to all the requirements of a Unified Communications (UC) platform. Microsoft has increasingly pushed for Teams to become the numero uno UC platform in the coming time. This means that it will keep on evolving the product until it gets way better than its competitors. Keeping this perspective in mind, we recommend you opt for Microsoft Teams for the promise of the future.

Get help to get started with Microsoft Teams

Moreover, there are a plethora of Microsoft Partners who can assist you get started with Microsoft Teams with minimum disruptions. Apps4Rent is a Tier 1 CSP and Microsoft Gold Partner, which means we are handpicked by Microsoft itself for offering services and products of Microsoft. You can get started with a basic Office 365 subscription which will also include popular productivity suite such as MS Office along with Teams. Apps4Rent can help you get started with Microsoft Teams in no time. We offer 24/7 real-time support via phone, chat, and email if you have any issues on deployment, on-boarding, and operations.

If you want any further clarifications or have any questions, feel free to contact us now!

The digital work hub is shifting from email to team collaboration applications. Increasingly users rely on them as their primary means of engaging with their co-workers to manage tasks, workflows, group conversations, sharing documents, and meetings.

Also, team collaboration is rapidly extending beyond enterprise boundaries as companies look to embrace team apps to improve engagement with partners, suppliers, and customers.

Recent studies show that nearly half (49%) of respondents said that business discussions, tasks, or transactions happening with users outside the company have now shifted from email to team collaboration platforms. Blade iii_il driver download for windows 10.

However, managing collaboration with external partners remains complicated. A lack of interoperability between collaboration platforms means organizations need a plan for handling collaboration with partners outside of the organization.

IT departments need to consider which platforms best support external collaboration. Additionally, they should plan how to provide access to external partners and manage the end of a collaborative project.

The most obvious option is to assign external team members accounts and licenses so they would look and act as if they all belong to the same company. However, this approach comes with several inherent pitfalls. Aside from cost considerations, these include the need to assign corporate email addresses and enforce access controls to ensure external team members can reach only the resources they need in the context of the project. As you might guess, this can lead to an administrative and data security nightmare.

Another option is for the host organization to invite external members to specific team collaboration resources on an as-needed basis as third-party guests. By default, guest access creates the proper levels of separation when working with external parties.

Currently, 44.2% of organizations rely on guest access for 3^rd party collaborations. Either to enable external access to their team collaboration platform or to allow their employees to use external team collaboration apps to connect with partner organizations.

Guest access works seamlessly if the external members have the same platform as the host organization. Also, depending on the team collaboration platform, the host and guest organizations using similar platforms, such as Slack, can merge, yet maintain separate access and data security.

For instance, with Slack Connect, separate organizations can collaborate in a Slack channel, each from within their own Slack workspace. Members can send direct messages, upload files, use apps and integrations, and start calls—all in a common space.

Microsoft Teams offers an external access federation option for Skype for Business customers that do not want to use guest accounts. However, this option is limited to IM and Presence messages.

But when it comes to managing collaboration with external partners that have different platforms, things become complicated. These organizations and their users have to create and use a stripped-down freemium guest account. A free account may or may not have all the features needed for collaboration, and the external partner may be required to purchase a license.

According to recent studies, nearly 42% of organizations run more than one team collaboration app internally. In such a case, external partners’ users may have to purchase several guest accounts to collaborate with the users of the host organization.

Also, administrators have no idea how far away from home their users are playing. Once someone accepts an invitation from another platform, everything they do inside that platform is invisible to the administrator of their home platform.

In general, the guest access method works well when companies need to add a few external members to a team. However, this capability can quickly become unmanageable when working with a third-party company that requires hundreds or more guest accounts.

In this article, I like to compare the guest account management capabilities of Microsoft Teams, Slack, and Cisco Webex Teams.

Security and Access Control

Slack

Slack guest accounts are available only on paid plans (Standard, Plus, and Enterprise Grid) and can be either Multi-Channel or Single-Channel. Multi-Channel Guests only have access to the invited channels. Slack charges for Multi-Channel Guests, and you can add them to an unlimited number of channels.

Both Multi-Channel or Single-Channel Slack guest accounts do not offer strong security measures like password complexity check, password expiration, and Two-Factor Authentication (2FA).

Webex Teams Cost Comparison

Slack Admins must manually provision guest accounts one by one. Admins can choose an automatic expiration date for each guest account.

Reference: https://slack.com/resources/slack-for-admins/external-collaboration-in-slack

Cisco Webex Teams

When the Webex Teams users send their invitations, non-Webex users are NOT initially required to have an account on the Webex teams to communicate with Webex users. However, this temporary access, available via URL, is only valid for 24 hours. After 24 hours, the external users must sign up for a Webex team account to continue collaborating with their colleagues through the platform.

The password policy for external Webex Teams accounts only requires letters and numbers and does not include Two-Factor Authentication (2FA). As a result, it’s nearly impossible for you to control whether accounts have strong security measures like password complexity check, password expiration, and Two-Factor Authentication (2FA).

Reference: in https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/collaboration-endpoints/webex-room-series/datasheet-c78-740772.html

Microsoft Teams

To understand Microsoft guest access, we should point out that guest access differs from external access in Microsoft Teams.

• External access gives access permission to an entire domain—allowing Teams users from other domains to find, contact, and set up meetings with you. External users can call you through Teams and send instant messages. But if you want them to be able to access teams and channels, guest access might be the better option.

• Guest access is when you invite an external user to be a member of the team—it gives access permission to an individual rather than a domain. Once a team owner has granted someone guest access, they can access that team’s resources, share files, and join a group chat with other team members.

Reference: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/MicrosoftTeams/guest-access

Reference: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/b2b/licensing-guidance

Reference: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftteams/teams-dependencies

Microsoft guest access requires corresponding Azure AD accounts for the guests. As a result, when users invite their external colleagues to collaborate that do not have O365 accounts, their colleagues must create and maintain Azure AD accounts.

Microsoft has detached the authorization of guest accounts from the authentication. By default, external Azure AD accounts do not have strong security measures like password complexity check, password expiration, and Two-Factor Authentication (2FA).

Once added to a team, an external user is considered a member, so there’s no way to make their access “read-only.”

Also, you cannot invite a guest to a specific channel in a team. You would need to either create a separate team dedicated to collaborating with internal users—or create private channels to hide particular content and conversations from guests within the team.

Delete/Remove Guest Accounts

Guest accounts require active management. For instance, contractors, clients, interns, or temporary employees come and go out of projects or change jobs or companies. Microsoft, Slack, and Cisco provide the ability to delete or remove guest accounts. However, managing guest accounts can become a security and management burden, which can result in hidden costs.

Also, administrators have no idea how far away from home their users are playing. Once someone accepts an invitation from another platform, everything they do inside that platform is invisible to the administrator of their home platform. For instance, given the success of Microsoft Teams, a user can end up being a guest in a surprising number of Microsoft Teams tenants.

Webex Teams Customer Support

Reference: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/MicrosoftTeams/manage-guests

Reference: https://petri.com/problem-guest-users-outside-tenant

Licensing Limitations & Costs

Slack

Single-Channel guest users are free. However, there is a limitation of 5 single-channel guest users per paid Slack user. In other words, a company with 1,000 Slack licenses can only send out 5,000 single-channel guest invitations.

There is no limitation on Multi-Channel guest users. However, Slack invoices them at the regular member prices.

Depending on the pricing plan, Slack bills between $8 to $15/person per month. As a result, 1,000 Multi-Channel guest users can cost up to $15,000.

Cisco Webex Teams

To manage, limit access, or limit the number of WebEx Teams, External accounts require Cisco Webex Control Hub Pro Pack for an additional cost of over $30.00 per user/mon.

Reference: https://help.webex.com/en-us/np3c1rm/Pro-Pack-For-Cisco-Webex-Control-Hub

Microsoft Teams

The number of guest accounts a company can extend is limited. For instance, Microsoft only allows five guest accounts per paid Azure AD license. In other words, a company with 1,000 Microsoft licenses can only send out 5,000 Guest Account invitations.

Microsoft guest account invites are not limited to MS Teams, but users can send them for other Microsoft services such as sharing files on One Drive and SharePoint.

There is no limitation or control on how many guest account a user can send out as long as your company stays within its overall limit. So, invitations can begin to pile up. If a user or team goes beyond your company’s limit, no one else can send guest account invites.

According to a recent report by Nemertes, guest accounts are problematic for several reasons:

• Lack of ability to enforce security policies or to monitor what is being shared by employees on external team apps

• Lack of ability to manage revocation of guest account access for those using guest accounts to allow external access to internal team spaces, and for employees who are using external team apps.

Acer lcd monitor al1751 driver download for windows. As a result, according to Irwin Lazard of Nemertes, “the use of guest accounts represents a significant security threat to an organization’s information resources. Guest accounts are also inefficient for employees and create administrative overhead for IT managers.”

The alternative to Guest Accounts – NextPlane Intercompany Collaboration

As a general rule, guest accounts are not a viable option for large enterprise companies. Also, external partners may not allow their employees to have guest accounts, or they may be in regulated industries such as healthcare, financial services, where guest accounts can potentially trigger compliance issues.

Also, administrators have no idea how far away from home their users are playing. Once someone accepts an invitation from another platform, everything they do inside that platform is invisible to the administrator of their home platform. People can have accounts on multiple platforms. Given the success of Microsoft Teams, a user on Slack or Cisco WebEx teams can end up being a guest in a surprising number of teams tenants.

Compliance is the obvious driver for why such oversight might be needed. Companies invest heavily in technologies like communications compliance policies to ensure their company remains within regulatory and legal requirements. Everything works well if collaboration activity remains inside the company. But if someone becomes a guest in another platform and begins communicating there (for instance, inside Slack chats or channel conversations), there’s no trace of what they are doing visible to their company, which undermines a carefully built compliance regime.

NextPlane eliminates the need for external users’ need to have access to your workspaces, chats, channels, and files. It also minimizes the IT administrative burdens.

NextPlane intercompany federation allows host organizations to connect to their external partners securely. As a result, their users can send messages, share their presence status & files, and participate in workspaces & channels, without leaving their respective client applications. Also, external contacts can do the same without leaving their preferred tools.

Using NextPlane Management Portal, you can seamlessly connect your organization with customers, partners, or suppliers. The NextPlane management portal gives you detailed reports on the users, the number of messages exchanged, as well as detailed usage reports by external partners.